This site has embedded my youtube video, but when you click to play it, it appears to have a transparent layer that detects the ‘play’ click and shows you a pre-roll ad of their own (not from YT) before my video starts.

They make money and I have visitors watching my video thinking I am greedy by placing a pre-roll ad in front of the video.

I like to share my videos by allowing embeds, but I am not sure I like others thinking I am greedy.

I think Google Buzz is pretty cool, but like Twitter the first time I used it, I am not sure if it is the real deal. Having those constant updates appear in my in box is getting annoying only after 1 full day – so the above image shows you how to turn it off at the bottom of Gmail. Your backgorund color might be different than mine.

Once you turn it off it is very easy to turn it back on again by clicking the “Turn on Buzz”.

I took that picture and placed on Flickr (under a creative commons license) and my SolarDave.com blog.

Later on other sites noticed it and blogged about including the picture and linked back to me which is totally cool.

However one of the sites placed a nofollow link on the link to my site. So I wrote them and politely asked them to make it a do follow link. They actually called me and told me they loved my blog, but when I asked them why not give me full credit for the photo they told me they don’t link out to sites they don’t partner with.

I laughed a little and then bit my lip because what I wanted to say was, “Hey shithead if you feel that way then I don’t give you permission to use my photo on your site.” But I was nice and just left it at that and got off the phone as quick as I could before I went off on the dude.

What are your thoughts on this? Shouldn’t a creative commons license require a dofollow link?

You can also follow the discussion on Flickr discussion groups.

I really enjoyed Bob Brisco’s keynote at PubCon 2009. One of the things he asked the audience was if anyone knew what the “GWC” acronym was – I had no clue. GWC – stands for “Guys With Cameras“. Even though I do not take pictures of models (he was referring one of Internet Brands site’s) I got a laugh out of that because I feel like I fit that acronym in some way. I just enjoy taking pictures everywhere I go – including PubCon as you can see above.

Part of the fun of PubCon is meeting new people. I got to meet some new people like Tony Tellijohn who has a snowmobile manuals site. And also John Beagle who has a computer rental site.

I have a notebook full of notes I need to go through today to see what I can do to improve some of my sites. I came up with some new ideas for my hobby solar panel site and a couple for my main sites. I definitely do not get as much out of these conferences as the first one I went to years ago but I feel good knowing that I am on the right track and I am not missing anything.

I was inspired to create this comic when I read that Marissa Mayer VP of search for Google was granted a patent on Google’s home page design.

Attribution to Randall Munroe of xkcd for his style of comics.

I wrote a review of SMX Advanced a couple of years ago and since it ranked so well some people have contacted me asking if I thought if it is worth the expense. So, here’s a review of this year’s conference.

I Like To Compare

It is hard not to compare SMX Advanced to PubCon. The biggest difference is the duration. SMX is only two days and PubCon is 3 days. This year I felt a little bit cheated because it seemed that on the final day of SMX, a session was missing.  PubCon packs each day full of sessions until you brain explodes  from information overload (which I kinda like).

Last Session

However, one advantage to SMX Advanced is having easy access to the speakers.  At each conference, I come with a list of questions for the experts.  At PubCon, you have to swing elbows to get access.  But, at SMX it is very easy to sit in the front and then ask your questions at the end of the session without having to worry about a mob of people behind you.

I Love Site Reviews

I love sessions that are very interactive with the audience. The more the better. That’s why I love all the PubCon site reviews. You can learn quickly and get new ideas by seeing other people’s mistakes. And nothing compares to the entertainment value of watching Rae Hoffman rip apart a site in 5 minutes flat.

Which is the best value?  I would have to say PubCon is better than SMX, but if you get access to an expert on social media and he or she provides you with some amazing piece of advice and you get a tons of .edu links in the next 3 months — than yes, it was worth the trip.

Get Me Out Of My Home Office!

For people like me that work out of their homes, it is really nice to get out of the house and go drinking with people that live and breathe the same stuff you do – sort of a “vacation from the home office“. That’s why listening to guys like Marty Weintraub is fun. I didn’t get any new information from his talk this year, but he is entertaining to listen to! (I loved the social profile talk he did this year.)

At this stage in my “career”, going to a conference twice a year mostly helps me know that I am on the right track and I am not missing anything new. For instance I used StumbleUpon a couple of years ago with success but have not had much luck recently. I went to Brent Csutoras session and learned what I have been doing wrong, and I will try using that tool again.

Great Food

Food wise, SMX blows PubCon out of the water. I think all of the staff at the Bell Harbor convention did an amazing job.

Convention Hall

Keynotes Should Not Be Based On The Top Sponsor

SMX keynote selection is usually Microsoft, which I am sure has to do with Microsoft being a big sponsor and the location of the conference. I think the Bing party was great and I think they are working very hard on search, but Steve Ballmer should have given the keynote.  His absense seemed to indicate they are not serious enough about this effort.

Bing Party with Live "Art"

Twitter Activity Rises Quickly With Boring Keynotes

You can always tell when the audience loses interest— the Twitter stream picks up. I must say the twitter stream during the keynote was more entertaining than the Microsoft keynote. Take the following.  A bit over the top IMHO, but funny.

I Recorded Most Of the Sessions

I recorded all the speakers that I was interested in on my IPhone and will listen to them one more time on my afternoon hikes before I delete them to see if I missed anything.

Quickvoice

Rae’s Karma

I loved Rae Hoffman’s little speech she gave on turning in your competitors. She told the story of how their top competitor is buying 6,000 links and she told Matt Cutts about the issue. Matt wanted her to give him the name of site but she wouldn’t because of karma, and she wanted Matt to find it on his own.  I don’t buy links.  My Karma is clean.

Ranking Factors

I really enjoyed Rand’s talk on ranking factors.  One of the things he talked about is going to heavily influence the direction I take for link development in the next 6 months.

seomoz linkjuice can

I will say that SMX is more advanced than the first year. Everyone gets to the core of their talk quickly now, without explaining the basics first (e.g. duplicate content).

All-in-all a great conference. Danny, if you are reading this, I think you and Chris did a great job (as always).  My only suggestion is to make it a little longer and have at least one site review in the SEO track.

Video I Created at The Matt Cutts Session

More Photos From My IPhone

Near Bell Harbor Convention Center

Seth Chernoff and Laszlo Ember

Dave and Seth Chernoff

John Beagle and Laszlo Ember

My video I did of SMX Advanced 2008 was placed on the SMX Advanced page (which was fun to see, even though I did not get a link out of it), along with it provided some insight to the sign-up processes of the conference.

The highest peak happened on a Friday March 13th. I would guess that was right before the price went up.

I have always thought that it would be great to be a Google employee within the AdWords or AdSense group for a month or two. Being an employee could provide amazing information on which publishers or advertisers are not only converting the best but also figure out which niches or verticals are the best to pursue.

I have always worried about competing against an ex-Google employee that has all this great conversion data in my verticals. I remember asking a Google rep years ago if low level employee like Keyen Farrell have access to that kind of  information and I was assured that they do not.  However in light of this new case I am being to think otherwise.

My wife used to practice law and she read Danny Sullivan’s blog post on the subject and said that Shoemoney’s lawyers might have a very interesting discovery process within Google if this case gets to proceed further. Imagine being Shoemoney’s lawyer and asking for whatever records they want in the discovery process.

I hope this goes to a court room so we can see within the Google back box. It would be sad if it gets settled out of court and the public can’t get a better idea of how Google run’s its show.

Update: I just got an email from Jeremy with a link to the complaint filed.

You only have so much time in the day, twittering is so fast and easy that blogging takes a back seat.

So if blogging is happening less, perhaps this will hurt Google because now instead of linking to something you like in your blog you are placing a link in twitter which has a no follow tag.

Google is mostly built on finding good sites from links, so if all these links on Twitter are not counting will Google’s algo suffer?

I had a friend on Comcast like myself in Colorado look and he sees the same ad too appearing over and over on both Comcast and Qwest so it must be a geolocation issue.

Looks like they are trying to sell renters insurance. It can’t be a very good user experience for my users unless I am the only one seeing it. Not sure what Google is up to – sounds like they might be having geolocation issues.

I just blocked the ad so hopefully in a few hours it will go away.